Markovate vs HYS Enterprise: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Markovate (4.6/5) edges ahead of HYS Enterprise (3.9/5) overall. Markovate is the better choice for founders wanting an AI-only product partner. HYS Enterprise is the stronger option for EU clients wanting Netherlands-based contracting with Poland delivery. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Markovate vs HYS Enterprise: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Markovate | HYS Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2007 |
| HQ | San Francisco, United States | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Team size | 51-200 | 213 |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, ahead of the current generative AI cycle | Amsterdam legal entity with an Eastern European delivery hub for EU-based contracting |
| Pricing model | Fixed project or dedicated team | Fixed project or dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Python, PyTorch, OpenAI API | Python, AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Logistics | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce |
Markovate vs HYS Enterprise: overview
Markovate
Markovate has run as an AI-only agency out of San Francisco since 2015, with a team in the 51-200 range under co-founder Rajeev Sharma. Rather than adding generative AI to an existing service list, the agency's decade of case studies has stayed centered on AI and machine learning product work specifically, which shows in how directly its team speaks to model choices and trade-offs rather than generic delivery language. That narrow focus trades breadth for depth: clients get an AI specialist, not a full-service development partner.
HYS Enterprise
HYS Enterprise was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Amsterdam, with its main development hub staffed by engineers across Eastern Europe based in Poland. As of mid-2026 the company reported 213 employees. It operates as an IT consulting and software development agency broadly, with AI delivered as an extension of its general consulting and engineering practice rather than a dedicated specialty area.
Services and capabilities: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Capability | Markovate | HYS Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Machine learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI consulting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✓ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Framework / platform | Markovate | HYS Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | ✓ | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| LangChain | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Criterion | Markovate | HYS Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Dimension | Markovate | HYS Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce | Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce |
| Best use cases | Turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior team., Getting a fast prototype built before deciding on an in-house AI hire. | Getting EU-based contracting terms with Eastern European delivery costs., Running a general IT consulting engagement that includes an AI component. |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Markovate vs HYS Enterprise: pros and cons
| Markovate | |
|---|---|
| + | Ten years of AI-only positioning predates most competitors' generative AI pivot. |
| + | Based in San Francisco, close to the model providers it integrates most often. |
| + | Willing to take direct founder calls rather than routing through account management layers. |
| + | Case studies describe shipped products rather than proof-of-concept demos. |
| - | Team size limits how many large concurrent engagements the agency can realistically run |
| - | No published minimum engagement figure to budget against upfront |
| HYS Enterprise | |
|---|---|
| + | Amsterdam headquarters simplifies EU-based contracting and data residency conversations. |
| + | Eastern European delivery hub keeps costs lower than a fully Western European team. |
| + | Nearly two decades of IT consulting experience. |
| + | Consistent, precisely reported headcount (213) rather than a wide estimated range. |
| - | AI is delivered as an extension of general IT consulting rather than a dedicated practice |
| - | Smaller team than most enterprise-scale agencies on this list, limiting very large program capacity |
Who should choose Markovate?
A typical fit: turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior team.
AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, ahead of the current generative AI cycle. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Logistics.
Who should choose HYS Enterprise?
A typical fit: getting EU-based contracting terms with Eastern European delivery costs.
Amsterdam legal entity with an Eastern European delivery hub for EU-based contracting. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce.
Decision matrix: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Markovate |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Markovate |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Markovate (Not disclosed) vs HYS Enterprise (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Markovate |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | HYS Enterprise |
Use case fit: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
| Use case | Markovate fit | HYS Enterprise fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turning a generative AI concept into a shipped product with a small, senior team. | Strong | Limited | Markovate |
| Getting a fast prototype built before deciding on an in-house AI hire. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Getting EU-based contracting terms with Eastern European delivery costs. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Running a general IT consulting engagement that includes an AI component. | Limited | Strong | HYS Enterprise |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Markovate vs HYS Enterprise
Markovate (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Development projects. AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, ahead of the current generative AI cycle.
HYS Enterprise (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need running a general IT consulting engagement that includes an AI component. If your situation matches that, HYS Enterprise is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Markovate vs HYS Enterprise FAQ
Is Markovate better than HYS Enterprise?
Markovate (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Markovate's strongest advantage: ten years of AI-only positioning predates most competitors' generative AI pivot. HYS Enterprise's strongest advantage: amsterdam headquarters simplifies EU-based contracting and data residency conversations.
How do Markovate and HYS Enterprise differ in pricing?
Markovate uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. HYS Enterprise uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Markovate or HYS Enterprise?
Markovate is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Markovate and HYS Enterprise?
Markovate's primary differentiator is: AI-exclusive focus dating to 2015, ahead of the current generative AI cycle. HYS Enterprise's primary differentiator is: amsterdam legal entity with an Eastern European delivery hub for EU-based contracting. They also differ in team size (51-200 vs 213), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Fintech, Healthcare vs Fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.